When you watch MTV today, you surprisingly may not find many music videos playing like MTV had long ago. However, music videos are still popular today on outlets such as Youtube and itunes. These music videos are still being played every day even though MTV does not. In addition, these videos play an important role in society in the way it influences us and in the way the visual actions interpret the music and lyrics.
When you listen to music, most of the time it may be on the radio or stereo. In other words, you do not usually watch music videos when you listen to music. However, I argue that by watching a music video, it changes one’s experience with that particular song from that point on. The visual aspect of the music video can change how one views the song. For example, a song may seem upbeat and exciting when listened to on the radio. However, the visual aspect of the music video may suggest a morbid and sad feeling that contradicts one’s previous opinions. Then, when listening to the song on the radio again, the same individual may not seem so excited and upbeat about the video. Personally, whenever I watch a music video, the video is instilled into my head from that point on. Then, whenever I listen to the song without the visual aspect, like perhaps on a car stereo, the music video is played in my mind while the music is played. The music video affects me far after I am done watching it and makes me feel different the next time I hear the same song, based on the visual aspect alone.
The same can be said for how the visual aspect of the video affects the meaning of the lyrics. For myself, I do not usually listen or pay attention to lyrics. I usually focus on the overall beat and melody. However, I find it hard to ignore the lyrics when a music video is being played. Perhaps because the artist may be speaking with the lyrics or the video is visually relating with the lyrics. I believe that a music video has all control of interpreting the lyrics. For example, Kevin Williams writes in “Why I [Still] Want My MTV” about a music video and the images presented. One lyric is “Right now, nothing is more expensive than regret” (150). However, the music video further interprets these otherwise confusing lyrics by showing an image, “A rolled condom appears bathed in light” (150). This reveals the true meaning of the lyrics that, without the visual aspect, could be left to be interpreted into anything.
The final aspect that, in my opinion, affects society today is the influences of dress, fashion, and actions that the music video expresses. I argue that this is based on mostly the visual aspect because the lyrical aspect alone can be interpreted by the visual aspect. Nevertheless, actions in the music video highly influence myself and society. For instance, “shutter shades” are glasses famously worn by Kayne West. The glasses offer no useful value. Rather, they are just fashionable because West wears them in his music videos and performances. The same can be said for clothing and many different types of fashions. Even the actions artists perform in their music videos influence society. For example, various dances such as the cupid shuffle or the “duggie”. Particular brands of products can be used in music videos that influence others to use the same because it was in the video.
Overall, I believe music videos have a direct affect on my life and society’s. The visual aspect effects the music’s meaning which affects how we listen to it and the feelings and emotions we get. Also, our fashion and actions are influenced based on the actions of the video.
Friday, April 29, 2011
Realism in Music Videos
When watching television, such as the news or talk shows, one might notice that programs seem to be presented in a live format, meaning they seem like they could be live at that moment even though we may know it is not. This “realism” is portrayed in various television programs and most programs are expected to follow this rule. In my opinion, this is an attempt to convince the viewer that he or she is actually at the event living the moment. For example, if a news program was presenting a news story of a house fire, the news program would use anything they have from the fire scene to make the viewer feel like he or she was there: sound clips of the fire, people standing around, sounds of sirens, visuals of flashing lights and fire hoses, and interviews from witnesses. I’m sure if the news program could somehow make the television burning hot and smoking so viewers could feel the fire, they would. This example can be said for many other television programs. But, this is because the events actually happened in real time and in front of a real audience. However, music videos are usually never filming in front of a live audience and it is never filmed in real time. The music video must now seem like a real live event. Music videos have the freedom, now to be prepared and film as a live event; an advantage that most television programs do not have.
When you view a music video that portrays realism, you may feel that you are actually seeing the band, live in front of you. However, this is not mainly true. Most music videos are filmed in front of a limited number of people (the film crew) and are never filmed in a live format. (meaning, if the music video is four minutes long, it did not take the band four minutes to film) Each shot is usually done carefully and separately. Kevin Williams states in “Why I [Still] Want My MTV” , “To establish this realism the technical and aesthetic aspects of television are rendered as invisible as possible through conventional modes of presentation that construct the appearance of being live” So, what techniques make music videos seem like a realistic and live event?
One is timing. By timing, I mean the timing of the video in relation to the soundtrack. For example, if there is a strong and steady bass beat in the music video, the drummer footage has to appear in sync with the audio. So, the bass hits should be perfect with the audio track. Without this synchronization, the video would fail to appear live in action and the fact that the video was not filmed live would be more prominent, distracting and turning-off the viewer.
Another aspect is details. This was not in my readings, but I feel like it should still be mentioned. I feel that continuity in filming is important, and if an error with this is found in the video, it can, again, turn-off and distract the viewer. For example, if the drummer is not holding drum sticks, or if the guitarist’s shirt was buttoning in one shot and un-buttoned in other. These details matter and can make or break a music video.
I argue that these techniques of making a music video seem real do not complicate filming a music video, but frees it from traditional television. Most television programs will not have a chance to go back and change a certain shot, because the real event was already filmed and in most cases, you cannot change reality such as a crime scene. However, music videos have to freedom to carefully craft each shot to appear real in however fashion or style it chooses.
When you view a music video that portrays realism, you may feel that you are actually seeing the band, live in front of you. However, this is not mainly true. Most music videos are filmed in front of a limited number of people (the film crew) and are never filmed in a live format. (meaning, if the music video is four minutes long, it did not take the band four minutes to film) Each shot is usually done carefully and separately. Kevin Williams states in “Why I [Still] Want My MTV” , “To establish this realism the technical and aesthetic aspects of television are rendered as invisible as possible through conventional modes of presentation that construct the appearance of being live” So, what techniques make music videos seem like a realistic and live event?
One is timing. By timing, I mean the timing of the video in relation to the soundtrack. For example, if there is a strong and steady bass beat in the music video, the drummer footage has to appear in sync with the audio. So, the bass hits should be perfect with the audio track. Without this synchronization, the video would fail to appear live in action and the fact that the video was not filmed live would be more prominent, distracting and turning-off the viewer.
Another aspect is details. This was not in my readings, but I feel like it should still be mentioned. I feel that continuity in filming is important, and if an error with this is found in the video, it can, again, turn-off and distract the viewer. For example, if the drummer is not holding drum sticks, or if the guitarist’s shirt was buttoning in one shot and un-buttoned in other. These details matter and can make or break a music video.
I argue that these techniques of making a music video seem real do not complicate filming a music video, but frees it from traditional television. Most television programs will not have a chance to go back and change a certain shot, because the real event was already filmed and in most cases, you cannot change reality such as a crime scene. However, music videos have to freedom to carefully craft each shot to appear real in however fashion or style it chooses.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)