When watching television, such as the news or talk shows, one might notice that programs seem to be presented in a live format, meaning they seem like they could be live at that moment even though we may know it is not. This “realism” is portrayed in various television programs and most programs are expected to follow this rule. In my opinion, this is an attempt to convince the viewer that he or she is actually at the event living the moment. For example, if a news program was presenting a news story of a house fire, the news program would use anything they have from the fire scene to make the viewer feel like he or she was there: sound clips of the fire, people standing around, sounds of sirens, visuals of flashing lights and fire hoses, and interviews from witnesses. I’m sure if the news program could somehow make the television burning hot and smoking so viewers could feel the fire, they would. This example can be said for many other television programs. But, this is because the events actually happened in real time and in front of a real audience. However, music videos are usually never filming in front of a live audience and it is never filmed in real time. The music video must now seem like a real live event. Music videos have the freedom, now to be prepared and film as a live event; an advantage that most television programs do not have.
When you view a music video that portrays realism, you may feel that you are actually seeing the band, live in front of you. However, this is not mainly true. Most music videos are filmed in front of a limited number of people (the film crew) and are never filmed in a live format. (meaning, if the music video is four minutes long, it did not take the band four minutes to film) Each shot is usually done carefully and separately. Kevin Williams states in “Why I [Still] Want My MTV” , “To establish this realism the technical and aesthetic aspects of television are rendered as invisible as possible through conventional modes of presentation that construct the appearance of being live” So, what techniques make music videos seem like a realistic and live event?
One is timing. By timing, I mean the timing of the video in relation to the soundtrack. For example, if there is a strong and steady bass beat in the music video, the drummer footage has to appear in sync with the audio. So, the bass hits should be perfect with the audio track. Without this synchronization, the video would fail to appear live in action and the fact that the video was not filmed live would be more prominent, distracting and turning-off the viewer.
Another aspect is details. This was not in my readings, but I feel like it should still be mentioned. I feel that continuity in filming is important, and if an error with this is found in the video, it can, again, turn-off and distract the viewer. For example, if the drummer is not holding drum sticks, or if the guitarist’s shirt was buttoning in one shot and un-buttoned in other. These details matter and can make or break a music video.
I argue that these techniques of making a music video seem real do not complicate filming a music video, but frees it from traditional television. Most television programs will not have a chance to go back and change a certain shot, because the real event was already filmed and in most cases, you cannot change reality such as a crime scene. However, music videos have to freedom to carefully craft each shot to appear real in however fashion or style it chooses.